Splunk Fundamentals 1 Practice Exam

As a general practice, exclusion is better than inclusion in a Splunk search. Is this statement true or false?

1. True

2. False

The correct answer is: False

The statement that exclusion is better than inclusion in a Splunk search is considered false. In Splunk searches, using inclusion rather than exclusion promotes clarity and efficiency. By focusing on specific data points or events that are relevant to the analysis, users can optimize search performance and reduce the amount of irrelevant data that is processed. When you include specific criteria in a search, Splunk can quickly filter through its indexed data to retrieve only what is necessary, which saves processing time and resources. In contrast, if you rely on exclusion, you may inadvertently miss relevant events or data that could provide important insights. Additionally, exclusion lists can become overly complex, making it more difficult to manage and understand the search logic. Thus, favoring inclusion creates a more directed approach to searching within Splunk, leading to more effective results and insights.